PDA

View Full Version : An interesting comment I found on the Twister


Dannicus
11-23-2007, 02:44 AM
I was cruisin the web. Found what, at first glance, was looking like a decent grappling site. Anyone ever look into http://www.grapplearts.com? Not that I am promoting it, Sub101 will always be first in my heart. (awwwwww) But I will post the question and answer for your opinions.

------------------------------
Q: You've previously discussed dangerous submissions. Do you think that the twister spine lock is a dangerous submission? How dangerous is the twister compared to other submissions, say something like a toehold.

A: The quick answer is that both submissions (the toehold and the twister) are dangerous.

If you were to collect injury statistics, you would probably find that more people have been hurt by toeholds than by the twister, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the twister is safer. The twister is a great submission - I use it myself whenever I get the chance - but it hasn't really hit the grappling mainstream yet. As such it is less commonly used and it's not surprising that injuries from this submission are still fairly rare.

The thing to remember about a twister is that it is a spine lock, just like other neck cranks, and that the spine, particularly the cervical spine which is targeted by this lock, is a delicate and unforgiving-once-injured body part.

One significant difference between the two techniques is the level of control necessary to apply the submission. The twister requires the victim to be pretty much immobilized and controlled, whereas the toehold can be applied with widely varying amounts of control (depending on the exact entry).

A common toehold injury scenario goes like this: one person applies a toehold on another person, but refrains from cranking it on because he knows that it can be a dangerous submission. The guy caught in the toehold decides to spin out - which is one of the correct counters - but spins in the wrong direction. Before the first person can let go something in the second person's leg goes snap, crackle, pop, and the toehold has claimed another victim.

When caught in the twister, on the other hand, it's very hard for your opponent to move this spastically. People still have egos, and it is very common for people to try and tough their way through a neck crank, only tapping after injury occurs.

I speak from personal and collective experience - neck injuries are no joke! I know a number of grapplers who have had their competitive careers cut short by neck injuries, and others who have quit the sport altogether. Severe neck injuries (or a series of less severe ones) can lead to herniated cervical disks, osteoarthritis, spondylosis, spondylitis, spondylolysis and many other nasty multi-syllabic conditions.

I use both submissions, but I treat them both with a lot of respect. If a person starts thrashing or refusing to tap I try to let go and move on to something else before they injure themselves and deprive me of a training partner.

Hadaka Jime
11-23-2007, 09:25 AM
i think no doubt the twister is more dangerous, not because people like dan, but people that in tournament will pull it not knowing how dangerous it is and severly damage the spine, and i am not saying it's common, and even if it was a mainstream move i think there would be less injuries, but they are much more life damaging injuries, a broken leg can happen from 1 of 8,000 reasons and is much more common than a broken or badly injured spine, honostley i think toeholds are dangerous because the fact that a tiny bit to much pressure will snap the leg with allmost no effort required, but the twister if it injures 1 in 1,000 people that are put into it... that 1 person will probably recover slower or never compaired to the 1 in 50 people injured by the toe hold, but the broken legs will heal and you most likely won't go the whole rest of your life with it still damaged, you may realize it is now your "bad leg" but really if you make a full recovery it is harder to break it again, as for the spine, it is very hard to make a full recovery in under a year, with out mass surgery you will allways have problems with the back

i actually prefer using the twister, for the fact i can control the persons body and the cant shake, and if they do it's not 1 inch and snap with me applying no pressure, i can loosen up on the neck and only apply the force needed, but if i have a tiny bit on a toe hold and you roll quickly the wrong way, i don't have time to loosen up and you basically broke your own leg by not tapping...

so overall i think the twister is safer, but if the person doing it is not aware of it's power... it can cause a life altering injury, but the toe hold is less safe because even if ari pulls it, if the opponent is spazzing out they can hurt themselfs and even a black belt can't control that, where as a white belt can control not injuring some one in the twister

this is why i prefer the crucifix/twister vs the toehold or heel hook, because even though there is potential of a more severe injury in cranks, they are both body imprissonments basically... the opponent has no where to go... and in heelhook/toe hold the leg can be broken with 1 wrong move causing it to happen so often